Prevalence of Keratoconus and Keratoconus Suspect among a sample of Iraqi Children with Refractive Errors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Aseel Sabr Rashak Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Ibn Al-Haitham Teaching Eye Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5552-3338
  • Nadia Abdulazeez Abdulateef Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Ibn Al-Haitham Teaching Eye Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5832-6130
  • Suzan Abdulkareem Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Ibn Al-Haitham Teaching Eye Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v7i2.1353

Keywords:

Keratoconus, Pediatric, Prevalence, Refractive errors

Abstract

Background: Keratoconus (KC) is a chronic, bilateral, non-inflammatory degenerative condition with severe consequences. Objective: To assess the prevalence of KC and Keratoconus Suspect (KCS) in a pediatric population with astigmatic error ≥1 diopter (D) and non-axial myopia. Methods: Between March and October 2022, a cross-sectional study was done with a group of 6–18-year-old kids with an astigmatic error of ≥1 D or non-axial myopia who went to the pediatric ophthalmology clinic at Ibn Al-Haitham Teaching Eye Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, for regular checkups. All patients got a thorough eye examination and corneal imaging using the Corneal Tomography System (CSO) Sirius equipment and Scheimpflug technology. Results: The majority of patients were females aged 110–14 years (55%). The frequencies of KC and SKC were 13.5 and 119.6%, respectively. The proportion of KC was substantially higher for those above the age of 14. Patients with KC exhibited considerably larger cylinder and axis measurements. Participants with inferior cones and an asymmetric Bow Tie exhibited greater rates of KC (51.2% and 29.4%, respectively). Except for Pachy-Thin and corneal volume mean values, all other metrics were considerably greater in KC and KCS patients than in control patients. Conclusions: The high prevalence of KC and KCS emphasizes the importance of this issue and the necessity for a systematic strategy for screening in pediatric age groups with refractive error.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Santodomingo-Rubido J, Carracedo G, Suzaki A, Villa-Collar C, Vincent SJ, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: An updated review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(3):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2021.101559

Singh RB, Parmar UPS, Jhanji V. Prevalence and economic burden of keratoconus in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024;259:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.009

Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, Asgari S, Emamian MH, Shariati M, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus in a population-based study in Shahroud. Cornea. 2013;32(11):1441-1445. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a0d014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a0d014

Ahmed AS, El-Agha MH, Khaled MO, Shousha SM. The prevalence of keratoconus in children with allergic eye disease in an Egyptian population. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(4):1571-1576. doi: 10.1177/1120672120942691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120942691

Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, Saatchi M, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Valadkhan M, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea. 2020;39(2):263-270. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002150

Sugar J, Macsai MS. What causes keratoconus? Cornea. 2012;31(6):716-719. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8c72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8c72

Lin KK, Chen YW, Yeh CT, Li PR, Lee JS, Hou CH, et al. Comparing the natural progression and clinical features of keratoconus between pediatric and adult patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12070-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12070-2

Castro-Luna G, Pérez-Rueda A. A predictive model for early diagnosis of keratoconus. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01531-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01531-9

Jinabhai A, O'Donnell C, Tromans C, Radhakrishnan H. Optical quality and visual performance with customised soft contact lenses for keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5):528-539. doi: 10.1111/opo.12133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12133

Gautam V, Chaudhary M, Sharma AK, Shrestha GS, Rai PG. Topographic corneal changes in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis: A report from Kathmandu, Nepal. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(6):461-465. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.05.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.05.013

Wade PD, Iwuora AN, Lopez L, Muhammad MA. Allergic conjunctivitis at Sheikh zayed regional eye care center, Gambia. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012;7(1):24-28. PMID: 22737383.

Caputo R, Versaci F, Pucci N, de Libero C, Danti G, De Masi S, et al. Very low prevalence of keratoconus in a large series of vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;172:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.009

Totan Y, Hepşen IF, Cekiç O, Gündüz A, Aydin E. Incidence of keratoconus in subjects with vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a videokeratographic study. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(4):824-827. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00664-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00664-3

Dantas PE, Alves MR, Nishiwaki-Dantas MC. Topographic corneal changes in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005;68(5):593-598. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492005000500004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492005000500004

Barreto J, Netto MV, Santo RM, José NK, Bechara SJ. Slit-scanning topography in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):250-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.027

Gomes JA, Rodrigues PF, Lamazales LL. Keratoconus epidemiology: A review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(1):3-6. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_204_21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_204_21

Salman A, Darwish T, Ghabra M, Kailani O, Haddeh Y, Askar M, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus in a population-based study in Syria. J Ophthalmol. 2022;2022:6064533. doi: 10.1155/2022/6064533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6064533

Shoja M, Besharati M. Evaluation of keratoconus by videokeratography in subjects with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). J Res Med Sci. 2006;11(3):164-169.

Serdarogullari H, Tetikoglu M, Karahan H, Altin F, Elcioglu M. Prevalence of keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus in subjects with astigmatism using pentacam derived parameters. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013;8(3):213-219. PMID: 24349664;

Safarzadeh M, Nasiri N. Anterior segment characteristics in normal and keratoconus eyes evaluated with a combined Scheimpflug/Placido corneal imaging device. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;28(3):106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.06.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.06.003

Downloads

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Rashak, A. S., Abdulateef, N. A., & Abdulkareem, S. (2024). Prevalence of Keratoconus and Keratoconus Suspect among a sample of Iraqi Children with Refractive Errors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ), 7(2), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v7i2.1353

Issue

Section

Original article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.