Novel Technique for Alveolar Ridge Expansion: A Comparative Clinical Study

Authors

  • ‪Amjed Al-Naaly‬‏ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8307-530X
  • Ahmed Fadhel Al-Quisi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-4696

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v7i1.1137

Keywords:

Alveolar ridge splitting, Dental implant, Osseodensification, Piezosurgery

Abstract

Background: Piezosurgery improved the split approach by making it safer, easier, and less prone to complications when treating extremely atrophic crests. Densah drills, with their unique design, expand the ridge by densifying bone in a reverse, non-cutting mode. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of sagittal piezosurgery, which involves cutting bone to the full implant depth and then expanding it using osseodensification drills. We use this technique to expand narrow alveolar bones and simultaneously place dental implants in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Methods: Fourteen patients received 31 dental implants. The maxillary arch received 19, and the mandible received 12 dental implants. This study will include patients who have narrow alveolar bone ridges (2.5–4 mm). After marking the implant sites with a pilot drill, we used a piezoelectric surgery tip to cut the alveolar crest to the depth of the planned dental implant. We then sequentially used Versah Drills, accompanied by extensive irrigation using cooled, sterile normal saline, and finally inserted the implant into the subcrestal level. Results: This study revealed a significant difference in alveolar ridge width immediately after the procedure, and the significant change in the mandible was slightly higher than that in the maxillary arch. However, all implants in both jaws achieved successful osseointegration. Conclusions: The alveolar ridge width changed a lot more in the mandible than in the maxillary arch after the procedure. These two strategies work well together to properly and simply expand severely atrophied alveolar ridges without affecting bone healing or the osseointegration process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Samieirad S, Soofizadeh R, Shokouhifar A, Mianbandi V. A two-step method for the preparation of implant recipient site in ssevere atrophic maxilla: A case report of the alveolar ridge split technique followed by bone expansion. J Dent Mater Tech. 2019;8(2):59-64.

Jamil FA, Al-Adili SS. Lateral ridge splitting (expansion) with immediate placement of endosseous dental implant using piezoelectric device: A new treatment protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:434–439. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003229.

Moro A, Gasparini G, Foresta E, Saponaro G, Falchi M, Cardarelli L, et al. Alveolar ridge split technique using piezosurgery with specially designed tips. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/4530378.

Manekar VS, Shenoi RS, Manekar SM, Morey S. The effect of modern devices of alveolar ridge split and expansion in the management of horizontally deficient alveolar ridge for dental implant: A systematic review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023;14:369–382. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_423_21.

Lin Y, Li G, Xu T, Zhou X, Luo F. The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03643-2.

Kim HY, Park JH, Kim JW, Kim SJ. Narrow alveolar ridge management with modified ridge splitting technique: A report of 3 cases. Case Rep Dent. 2023;2023. doi: 10.1155/2023/9968053.

Ahmed OEFMS, Mahmoud AAF, Ali HEM, AlAshmawy MM, Abdullah AB, Fattah MAA, et al. Assessment of narrow alveolar ridge expansion by ossiodensification vs. ridge splitting technique for dental implant placement. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2022:392–403. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6ns9.12291.

Gangwani KD, Shetty L, Kulkarni D, Seshagiri R, Chopra R. Piezosurgery versus conventional method alveoloplasty. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018;8:181–187. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_162_18.

Duttenhoefer F, Varga P, Jenni D, Grünwald L, Thiemann L, Gueorguiev B, et al. The alveolar ridge splitting technique on maxillae: A biomechanical human cadaveric investigation. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/8894471.

Jha N, Choi EH, Kaushik NK, Ryu JJ. Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180342.

Alattar AN, Bede SYH. Does mixed conventional/piezosurgery implant site preparation affect implant stability? J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:e472–475. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004490.

Stübinger S, Stricker A, Berg BI. Piezosurgery in implant dentistry. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015;7:115–124. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63466.

Pereira CCS, Gealh WC, Meorin-Nogueira L, Garcia-Júnior IR, Okamoto R. Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: Clinical and biological aspects. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:401–408. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00196.

Rickert D, Vissink A, Slater JJRH, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM. Comparison between conventional and piezoelectric surgical tools for maxillary sinus floor elevation. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:297–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x.

Jiheel YJ, Mohammed JA. Evaluation of osseointegration of dental implants prepared by piezosurgery (Clinical Study). J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2017;29(1). doi: 10.12816/0038680.

Althobaiti AK, Ashour AW, Halteet FA, Alghamdi SI, AboShetaih MM, Al-Hayazi AM, et al. A comparative assessment of primary implant stability using osseodensification vs. conventional drilling methods: A systematic review. Cureus. 2023. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46841.

Pranno N, De Angelis F, Fischetto SG, Brauner E, Andreasi Bassi M, Marrapese A, et al. Effects of osseodensification protocols on insertion torques and the resonance frequency analysis of conical-shaped implants: An in vitro study on polyurethane foam blocks. Appl Sci. 2024;14:1196. doi: 10.3390/app14031196.

Ibraheem NS, Al-Adili SS. Assessment of dental implant stability during healing period and determination of the factors that affect implant stability by means of resonance frequency analysis (Clinical study). J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2015;27(3):109-115.

Omi M, Mishina Y. Roles of osteoclasts in alveolar bone remodeling. Genesis (United States). 2022;60. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23490.

Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoğlan M, Oztunç H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):1016-1021. doi: 10.1111/clr.12219.

Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Pagnutti S, Vinci R, Gherlone EF. Distribution of trabecular bone density in the maxilla and mandible. Implant Dent. 2019;28(4):340-348. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000893.

Chugh T, Ganeshkar SV, Revankar AV, Jain AK. Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2013;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-38.

Elgrany EA, Mwafey IM, Abo Zaid FAA, Hassan KS. The effect of piezosurgical ridge splitting and osseodensification on the primary stability of the implant in narrow ridge: Comparative randomized controlled split mouth clinical trial. Al-Azhar Assiut Dental J. 2019;2:31–39. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2019.60180.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-08

How to Cite

Al-Naaly‬‏, ‪Amjed, & Al-Quisi, A. F. (2024). Novel Technique for Alveolar Ridge Expansion: A Comparative Clinical Study. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ), 7(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v7i1.1137

Issue

Section

Original article

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.